The authoritarian Erdogan has crossed a red line in threatening Israel
It has been increasingly evident that Turkey under Recep Teyyep Erdogan is a rogue nation in NATO – a Trojan Horse for the Iran-embracing “Axis of Resistance” within the Western alliance. He has flirted with Russia, sabotaged NATO expansion, aggressed neighbors and destroyed his country’s developing democracy. After his threat this week to invade Israel, crossing a major line, NATO must read him the riot act.
The threat to “enter” Israel in defense of Iran’s terrorist proxy Hezbollah, delivered at a meeting of his AK Party, should not be misread as bluster. It is a calculated escalation from the playbook of hubristic tyrants: As a sense of impunity sets in they gamble, often recklessly – as with Adolf Hitler’s calamitous 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union.
An actual Turkish invasion of Israel right now is extremely unlikely; Turkey is a NATO member and Israel is a nuclear power and even Erdogan is probably not quite that ridiculous. But that should not blind the world to the reality that if a regional war were to erupt, in which Israel and its allies would essentially be facing Iran and its proxy armies around the Middle East, Turkey would align itself with the enemies of the West.
That Erdogan even flirts with such a posture results from acquiescence to his broad palate of misdeeds over the 21 years of his misrule over an important country of 85 million people. A quick summation may shock anyone who has not been paying close attention.
It is important to note that when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was established in 1949, it was assumed that member states would be democratic and peaceful. The principles underlying the project emphasized democratic values, collective security, rule of law, individual liberties and peaceful resolution of disputes.
Turkey was nobody’s model for much, but it was moving in the direction of such principles until 2003, when Erdogan won enough parliament seats to make him prime minister. He then proceeded to write the textbook on how to mutate into an authoritarian regime whose only democratic element is elections which can be manipulated.
Thousands of journalists, judges and generals are in jail, as well as high-profile politicians from opposition parties. Many academics and civil society activists have been detained or dismissed. Divisive rhetoric was deployed with skill to marginalize Kurds, Armenians, and other minorities. He has made Islam far more prominent in public life, alienating secularists and minorities and badly rattling the economy.
In 2017 Erdogan pushed through a controversial referendum that turbo-charged the presidency, shoehorned him into it, and abolished the office of prime minister. This allowed him enormous influence over the judiciary. From there it was a short path to anti-terrorism laws silencing and dissent and criminalizing protests, election irregularities, voter suppression and interference with opposition campaigns. As part of that strategy, he has ensured that the media is mostly either state-controlled or owned by cronies.
This level of oppression has both created the need for international adventurism (to distract the downtrodden public) and enabled it (since criticism is muted). So Turkey has adopted a more aggressive foreign policy, which has led to tensions and conflicts with neighbors.
Turkey has conducted multiple military operations in northern Syria, targeting Kurdish groups (which are backed by the West) which it considers terrorist organizations. In Iraq, Turkish military forces have frequently crossed into northern Iraq to target Kurdish bases. Turkey’s assertive claims and drilling in disputed areas of the Eastern Mediterranean have escalated tensions with Greece and Cyprus (the Mediterranean island whose north is occupied by Turkey – with the rest of it a European Union member).
Turkey also provided military support to the Government of National Accord (GNA) in Libya – one of the rival authorities in that chaotic country. And it offered arms supplies and political cover to the authoritarian regime in Azerbaijan in its aggression toward the disputed enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh; last fall, Baku attacked the long-autonomous enclave, sparking the panicked flight of all the 120,000 ethnic Armenians who lived there.
Interestingly, in his statement on Sunday, Erdogan hinted at more direct involvement in those conflicts that had been believed, saying: “We must be very strong so that Israel can’t do these ridiculous things to Palestine. Just like we entered Karabakh, just like we entered Libya, we might do similar to them.”
Turkey has also spread disinformation to influence public opinion in neighboring countries, ignored international court rulings, supported Islamist groups in the region creating frictions with countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, and more. It is seen by the moderate elements in the region as a destabilizing force.
As regards NATO, Turkey has taken several actions that have strained and undermined that relationship. These include acquisition of the Russian S-400 air defense system, which led to U.S. sanctions and to its expulsion at great cost from the F-35 stealth fighter program (as the S-400 is incompatible with NATO’s integrated defense systems and could be used to gather intelligence on NATO aircraft). Turkey has occasionally blocked NATO defense plans, particularly those concerning the Baltic states and Poland, and tried to block the recent accession to NATO of Sweden and Finland.
Its unilateral military actions in Syria have complicated NATO’s efforts in the region, particularly in the fight against ISIS. Frequent violations of Greek airspace and territorial waters by Turkish military aircraft and naval vessels have heightened tensions with that fellow NATO member. It has also upset NATO member France with disputes in the Mediterranean near Libya.
Turkey has pursued energy projects that bypass traditional NATO allies, such as the TurkStream pipeline with Russia. And in what may be the most potent issue for Europeans, it has used the threat of allowing large numbers of Mideast refugees to cross into Europe as leverage, fueling far-right politics across the continent.
So, what to do?
When a NATO member exhibits behavior that undermines the alliance’s principles and unity, NATO has several options beyond the obvious route of quiet diplomacy to get the member in line.
It could implement economic sanctions against key individuals and entities within the rogue regime – such as asset freezes, travel bans, and restrictions on financial transactions. It can suspend military aid, funding, and training programs provided by NATO to the member state. It can withhold or limit participation in joint exercises and operations, reducing the rogue state’s influence. It can temporarily suspend the member state from participating in key NATO committees and decision-making bodies.
Expulsion would be an extreme scenario for which there are no clear procedures – though a unanimous decision among members should be enough. That is not a great outcome, because the West prefers Turkey on-side for its strategic location, military capabilities, and perhaps especially for the use of the Incirlik Air Base. But there may be some leverage in the very threat, as Turkey benefits from NATO membership too – through security guarantees, diplomatic and military clout, and economic ties.
But the current situation cannot be tolerated.
To understand the implications, consider that NATO’s Article 5 on collective defense says an armed attack against a member is considered an attack against all. That means that if in an edge scenario Turkey is at war with Israel, then Israel would in some way be at war with NATO. It’s safe to say that NATO does not want any part in such a scenario.
To cut this off, it must take action now.
Journalist Evan Gershkovich freed in biggest US-Russia prisoner swap since the Cold War
